What's the Difference Between Amazon MSK and MSK Serverless?
Compare Amazon MSK and MSK Serverless side by side — features, pricing, and ideal use cases to help you choose the right product.
Compare side-by-side
|
Comparisons
|
Amazon MSK
|
MSK Serverless
|
|---|---|---|
|
Category
|
Analytics, Managed Kafka |
Analytics, Serverless Streaming |
|
Description
|
Fully managed Apache Kafka service |
Run Apache Kafka without managing and scaling cluster capacity. |
|
Best for
|
|
|
|
Key features
|
|
|
|
Pricing model
|
Pay per broker hour + storage |
Pay per cluster hour + partition hour + data |
|
Free tier
|
No |
No |
|
Expert take
|
“MSK is for teams that need Apache Kafka compatibility with existing tooling (Kafka Connect, Schema Registry, KSQL). MSK Serverless removes broker sizing entirely. If you do not need Kafka-specific APIs and just want to stream data into S3 or Redshift, Kinesis Data Firehose is simpler.” |
“MSK Serverless auto-scales Kafka cluster capacity based on throughput. You create topics and produce/consume messages without choosing broker types or managing partitions.” |
|
Product page
|
When to use Amazon MSK or MSK Serverless
Use Amazon MSK when:
- Event streaming
- Log aggregation
- Metrics collection
- Stream processing
- Event sourcing
Use MSK Serverless when:
- Event streaming
- Serverless Kafka
- Variable workloads
- Development environments
Next steps with AWS for Analytics
AWS product comparisons
Did you find what you were looking for today?
Let us know so we can improve the quality of the content on our pages